The ability to customize and own sex dolls introduces nuanced ethical considerations about individuality, objectification, and societal impact. Customization options—ranging from physical features to personality traits—allow users to create highly personalized objects, blurring lines between human likeness and objectification. Critics argue that excessive customization may reinforce superficial perceptions of beauty and reduce individuals to commodities. Ownership rights also raise questions about the morality of possessing inanimate representations of humans, especially if they depict minors or other sensitive categories. Ethical concerns include the potential for such dolls to perpetuate harmful fantasies or normalize inappropriate behaviors. Additionally, questions about consent, agency, and the moral implications of owning a “person-like” object are central to this debate. On the other hand, advocates suggest that customization empowers users to explore their identities and desires safely, providing a form of control and self-expression. Ensuring ethical ownership involves establishing guidelines that prevent the creation or purchase of problematic dolls and promoting responsible use. Society must carefully consider how customization and ownership practices influence perceptions of human dignity, objectification, and societal norms.